Was Hillary fired for lying and unethical behavior? Truth is between the lines.

This story pop's up from time to time and I will do my best to help make it a little more clear.  Keep in mind that if you only look at things as if you were in a stadium and your only concern in life is whether your team is winning on point's then you might as well move on now.  I am an American, I am not rooting for the R's or the D's and can give a rat's behind what the score is.  The future of my country is not a game to me.  I will not be misdirected by a party machine to keep me occupied.

Now to get to the bottom of this story.


The problem is in the semantics.  You must look at this through a clear lens.  You have to look at it through the lens of what is allowed in HR practices within the Government and within special inquiries.  You have to look at it through the lens of understanding human behavior and how it mirrors one's true character.  Then you have a decision to make.

Was Hillary Rodham Clinton “fired” from her position for being a “liar” and “unethical”.  The Answer is NO.  The official document at the time shows her and a couple other staffers being let go because of decreased workload in the case.  An opportunity her, then boss, took to get her off the team - easily and without hassle. Her boss at the time, Jerry Zeifman, a Democrat, who served as counsel and chief of staff for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation.

Generally this is where Hillary herself and her sycophants will stop.  They will call you a hater, a sexist etc. etc. if you continue to discuss it.

So the official documents of her release from the prosecution team state she was let go with some other staffers due to the decrease in workload in the case at the time and she was no longer needed, thus invoking the decrease in staff due to the workload provision of the special prosecutors HR mandate and he let her go. In Jerry Zeifman's own book and in numerous interviews from the 80's, 90's and 2000's made it very clear as to how he felt about her performance.  He said that during the investigation Hillary Clinton had “…engaged in a variety of self-serving, unethical practices in violation of House rules.” Zeifman also said "If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her." She falsified legal briefs and confiscated public documents with the intent to hide the content from the legal teams.

Jerry Zeifman has been consistent in his criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s work on the Watergate investigation.  Specifically in a 1999 interview with the Scripps Howard News Service, Zeifman said he didn’t have the power to fire Clinton, or else he would have.  “Well, let me put it this way: I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — were no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not — recommend her for any further positions.”  When pressed, Zeifman said he couldn’t recommend Hillary Rodham Clinton for future positions, “Because of her unethical conduct.” Despite that, however, Clinton was terminated because she was “no longer needed” — not because she had lied, according to Zeifman’s own account.

Now anyone with knowledge of the HR process, especially within the federal government knows without a doubt that it was far easier for him at that time to simply move her on her way with the already provided for decrease in staff proviso than to proceed with an HR case for lying and unethical behavior.  Remember, at this time in history Hillary was NOT the Governors wife, the First Lady, A senator from New York she was only a few years out of Law School and just one a many lawyers available in D.C.  There was no way to see 40 years into the future.  He simply did what 95% of supervisors in the Federal Government would do with a employee they want rid of.  It was a choice of convenience and it is done all the time.  The federal government HR processes are crushing under their own weight at best and to believe that someone wouldn't take the the easier path is rather naive.

These are the FACTS.  Now it is up to you to pass judgement on the behavior she exhibited when no one was looking, when things weren't going the way she wanted, and the ethical lines she will cross.
These are things that give you a window into the real person.

You have to decide if these things matter to you.  Of course that would be a reflection on your own character now wouldn't it.